Prediction of Charles Broom [316th] vs Daniel Little [843rd] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L L L L L L
Form
L W W L L W L L W LH2H: Broom 3 - 2 Little
They have played 12 sets in total, with Broom winning 7 and Little winning 5. The last match between Broom and Little was at the M25 Nottingham, 03-05-2023, First, Hard with Daniel Little getting the victory 3-6 7-5 7-6(6).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Charles Broom | 3 |
| Daniel Little | 2 |
| Broom | Stats | Little |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 316 | Ranking | 843 |
| 235 | Highest Rank | 564 |
| 26 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 1 |
| 61% (226-146) | Career Total W/L | 56% (100-80) |
| $39,970 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-5 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Daniel Little
Player
Charles Broom
49%
(
56 of
115)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
15
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
52 of
74)
46%
(
27 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
47 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
113
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-4 5-7 6-1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Daniel Little
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
5
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| 6-2 7-6(2) |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Daniel Little
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Daniel Little
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 7 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 66 | Games Won | 55 |
| 28 | Aces (Total) | 38 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 1:42:36 | Average Match Time | 1:42:36 |
| 66% (215/326) | 1st Serve % | 60% (245/406) |
| 78% (168/215) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (171/245) |
| 53% (59/111) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (70/161) |
| 43% (16/37) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (9/17) |
| 41% (165/406) | Return Points Win % | 30% (99/326) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 75% (4/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (4/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Charles Broom vs Daniel Little Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Broom 3 - 2 Little
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Broom has won 44.14% of points on their second serve, while Little has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Broom, in recent form, has won 51.18% of their opponent's second serve points, while Little has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.93% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Broom has saved 63.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Little has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Broom has won 49.15% of matches played (W/L 29/ 30), with Little winning 50% (W/L 8/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 59/ 44). Little has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Broom has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.33% of matches (W/L 13/ 17), where as Little has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 8/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Broom winning 3 times and Little being victorious 2 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Broom winning 7 and Little winning 5. The last match between Broom and Little was at the M25 Nottingham, 03-05-2023, First, Hard with Daniel Little getting the victory 3-6 7-5 7-6(6).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:36.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Broom and Little have played a deciding set 2 times, with Broom winning 1 times and Little 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Broom winning 1, and Little 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Broom has played against opponents with an average rank of 347.98 while Little has played against players with an average rank of 257.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Broom has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Little has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Broom has converted 33.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Little has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Charles Broom vs Daniel Little Best Odds For The Match
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Edward Winter
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
7%
(
1 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jagger Leach
Player
Charles Broom
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
11
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Charles Broom
67%
(
69 of
103)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
129)
11
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
56 of
69)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
65 of
88)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
31 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
44 of
129)
116
Total Points Won
116
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Charles Broom
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
13
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 0-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
10
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Charles Broom
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Duda
Player
Charles Broom
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
11
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Little Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ewen Lumsden
Player
Daniel Little
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
91)
17
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
27%
(
23 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
7
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Daniel Little
60%
(
76 of
127)
1st Serve %
53%
(
65 of
123)
11
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
51 of
65)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
42 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
42 of
123)
127
Total Points Won
123
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Coquelin
Player
Daniel Little
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Ali Habib
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
44%
(
21 of
48)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luc Fomba
Player
Daniel Little
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Demetris Azoides
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
11 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Broom vs Little?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Broom Vs Little is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (226/146) | Win/Loss | 56% (100/80) |
| 58% (512/364) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (223/177) |
| 54% (4443/3847) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2026/1830) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.6 |
| 1572 | Aces Total | 1125 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 926 | Total Double Faults | 315 |
| 1:26:31 | Average Match Time | 1:23:5 |
| 388.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 418.38 |
| 62% (13177/21376) | 1st Serve % | 59% (6249/10596) |
| 70% (9224/13177) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (4627/6249) |
| 50% (4095/8198) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2132/4347) |
| 41% (937/2303) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (363/869) |
| 41% (9195/22609) | Return Points Win % | 37% (3841/10375) |
| 61% (224/369) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (100/180) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (58/117) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (35/58) |
| 53% (70/131) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (17/40) |
| 86% (218/187) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (107/90) |
| 14% (218/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (107/17) |
| 25% (154/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (73/10) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
